[Arm-arch] Some ideas about Arm-Arch SIG running

Hi All, We all know Arm-Arch SIG was built months ago. It absolutely is a good news for all who have strong interests on Arm64. But SIG seems a bit too quiet. So I would like to raise some ideas below to trigger the possible wide discussion. Because Arm-Arch SIG is just initiated, some general questions probably make sense. * What is role and objective of Arm-Arch SIG * To steer the Arm64 based technology directions? To productize some valuable architectural features based on service scenarios? To stabilize Arm64 based OS as the cornerstone of OpenAnolis? Or …. * There are many other SIGs, such as Cloud Kernel, what is the relationship with or difference from those partner SIGs? * As the downstream of Linux kernel mainline, how to interact with mainline? * … * What is the governance hierarchy or model of this SIG * Are there any consistent principles about SIG governance? * Are there any role definitions for this SIG? * How to keep the balance between efficiency and high quality output based on some governance rules? * … * Are there any facilities or resources needed to support SIG running * How to improve the cooperation among multiple participators? * How to make engineering contributions in this SIG? * How to make the engineers’ life more easier? * … * The first step for Arm-Arch * What can/should we do as the first step? * Can we discuss everything about Arm-Arch in public channels from now on? * … Any comments are welcome! To make Arm-Arch SIG better. Cheers, Erik