Hi All,
We all know Arm-Arch SIG was built months ago. It absolutely is a good news for all who have strong interests on Arm64. But SIG seems a bit too quiet. So I would like to raise some ideas below to trigger the possible wide discussion.
Because Arm-Arch SIG is just initiated, some general questions probably make sense.
* What is role and objective of Arm-Arch SIG
* To steer the Arm64 based technology directions? To productize some valuable architectural features based on service scenarios? To stabilize Arm64 based OS as the cornerstone of OpenAnolis? Or ….
* There are many other SIGs, such as Cloud Kernel, what is the relationship with or difference from those partner SIGs?
* As the downstream of Linux kernel mainline, how to interact with mainline?
* …
* What is the governance hierarchy or model of this SIG
* Are there any consistent principles about SIG governance?
* Are there any role definitions for this SIG?
* How to keep the balance between efficiency and high quality output based on some governance rules?
* …
* Are there any facilities or resources needed to support SIG running
* How to improve the cooperation among multiple participators?
* How to make engineering contributions in this SIG?
* How to make the engineers’ life more easier?
* …
* The first step for Arm-Arch
* What can/should we do as the first step?
* Can we discuss everything about Arm-Arch in public channels from now on?
* …
Any comments are welcome! To make Arm-Arch SIG better.
Cheers,
Erik
